LAV with use of additional search

Wednesday, August 27th, 2008

In this purchase path, the consumer does a search and on the same day makes a purchase. Then over a week later, they do another search and re-discover your site. They make a second purchase a few days later, and a third purchase a few days after that.

a) In this attribution rule, you are choosing to allocate the credit for all 3 sales to the original search ad. The argument for this is that the original ad deserves all credit for the sales. For instance if you’re a marketer focused on customer acquisition, you may want to give the ad that acquired the customer credit for all future sales and ignore the impact that future advertising may have on their repeat purchases.

b) In this attribution rule, you are giving conversion credit to the ad that occurred prior to the sale, regardless of the type of ad it is. The argument for doing this is that you believe you should allocate sales back to the most recent ad that was engaged in by the consumer.

c) In this attribution rule, you believe the initial ad that got the customer in the first place deserves some credit for future sales. You also believe that the additional search is worthy of some credit for future sales. The argument for this rule is that the ad that introduced the consumer to your business and produced their first conversion is special and therefore deserves some % of the future sales that occur. You also believe that the additional search deserves some form of credit for future sales.

See how others voted

LAV (Lifetime Ad Value) with use of Email

Wednesday, August 27th, 2008

In this purchase path, the consumer does a search, clicks on an ad, and on the same day makes a purchase. After their first purchase, they are now in your customer retention email program. Two days after receiving their first email, they come back to your site to buy again. They then make a third purchase a couple days later.

a) In this attribution rule, you are choosing to allocate the credit for all 3 sales to the original search ad. The argument for doing this is that you don’t value an email retention campaign as having the same effectiveness as a consumer proactively searching for a product you sell. Without the original search ad that produced the sale, they would have never been enrolled in the email program.

b) In this attribution rule, you are giving conversion credit to the ad that occurred prior to the sale, regardless of the type of ad it was. The argument for doing this is that you believe you should allocate sales back to the most recent ad that was engaged in by the consumer.

c) In this attribution rule, you believe the initial ad that got the customer in the first place deserves some credit for future sales. You also believe that the addition of the email deserves some credit as well. The argument for this rule is that the ad that introduced the consumer to your business (and their1st sale) is special and therefore deserves some % of the future sales that occur. You also believe that your email retention program deserves some form of credit for future sales

See how others voted

Lifetime Ad Value (LAV)

Wednesday, August 27th, 2008

In this purchase path, the consumer does a search, clicks on an ad, and on the same day makes a purchase. Then that same consumer, without the need of additional advertising, makes a second purchase over a week later. A couple days after that, they make another purchase

a) In this attribution rule, you are choosing to give the ad that was responsible for the first sale credit for the future sales as well. The argument for this rule is that without being there during their first search, you may have not gotten the initial sale and therefore would not have received any of the future sales either.

b) In this attribution rule, you are giving the search ad credit for only the sale generated on the day it was clicked. The argument for doing this is that you believe the ad should only get credit for a sale you can directly tie it to.

c) In this attribution rule, you are giving the search ad complete credit on the day it was clicked and some additional credit for the future sales that were generated as well. The argument for this rule is that you believe without the initial ad, the 2nd and 3rd sales may not have occurred and therefore you want to give some, but not all, credit back to the initial ad.

See how others voted

LAV with a Sales Call

Wednesday, August 27th, 2008

In this purchase path the consumer does a search and on the same day makes a purchase. Then over a week later they receive a sales/customer service call. A few days after that they make another purchase.

a) In this attribution rule, you are choosing to allocate the credit for both sales to the original search ad. The argument for doing this is that without the original search ad, the salesperson would have no one to call. Therefore the ad that got the customer deserves all the credit.

b) In this attribution rule, you are giving conversion credit to the item that occurred prior to the sale- either the ad or the call. The argument for doing this is that you believe the sale should be allocated back to the most recent engagement with the consumer.

c) In this attribution rule, you believe the initial ad that got the consumer in the first place deserves some credit for future sales. The argument for this rule is that the ad that introduced the consumer to your business and lead to the first conversion deserves a percent of future sales that occur. Also, the addition of the sales call is worthy of some percent of the credit for future sales.

See how others voted

ClearSaleing’s 3.6 Release of its Online Advertising Analytics Platform Delivers Improved Attribution Management to Advertising Agencies

Monday, August 25th, 2008

New .NET Foundation and User Interface Overhaul Deliver Many Important Features to both Advertising Agencies and the Online Advertisers They Serve, Including Improved Attribution Management

Columbus, OH (PRWEB) August 25, 2008 — ClearSaleing Inc. (http://www.clearsaleing.com), an online advertising analytics and technology company, today announced the release of version 3.6 to their online advertising analytics application.

News Image

We engaged an external interactive design agency who are experts in the visual design of applications. The new user interface will provide an improved visual framework for the application features that are in development for release later this year

The release is highlighted by several new features, an upgrade to Microsoft’s .NET 3.5 Framework and a user interface overhaul that delivers improved attribution management and the ability to “white label” its application for both interactive and traditional advertising agencies. ClearSaleing has enhanced its online advertising analytics application to provide a more user friendly application experience for its clients and its advertising agency partners. All aspects of the application were enhanced to improve the look and feel, and data visualization components of the application.

“ClearSaleing is committed to providing the most advanced Advertising Analytics application on the market and to maintaining our leadership position in attribution management technology through our Purchase PathTM technology,” said Luke Tuttle, CTO of ClearSaleing.

“We engaged an external interactive design agency who are experts in the visual design of applications. The new user interface will provide an improved visual framework for the application features that are in development for release later this year,” Tuttle said.

About ClearSaleing

ClearSaleing is a leading technology provider to the online advertising market. Based on a strategic, portfolio management approach to online advertising investment, the ClearSaleing solution represents the next generation in advertising analytics technology. ClearSaleing’s portfolio management software delivers an improved, more profitable allocation of a company’s spend across a complex mix of online advertising options. At the foundation of the ClearSaleing solution is its patent-pending Purchase Path technology that accurately attributes profit (ROI) across the multiple ads that contribute to and influence the ultimate purchase.

CSEs (Comparison Shopping Engine) with a Branded Search

Sunday, August 24th, 2008

In this purchase path, the consumer does a search on a CSE and clicks on ad for Finish Line. They then: leave the CSE, go to a search engine, type in the company’s name, click on sponsored link and convert.

a) In attribution rule A, you would be allocating the profit, revenue, conversion credit across all ads involved in purchase equally. The argument for this rule is that every ad involved in the sale is equally important and therefore deserves equal credit.

b) In attribution rule B you are giving 100% credit to the last ad that was clicked on prior to the conversion. The argument for doing this is that you are giving credit to the ad that seems most directly responsible for the conversion.

See how others voted

Branded Search

Sunday, August 24th, 2008

In this purchase path, the consumer searches for running shoes and clicks on a Finish Line ad. They then refine the search further to look for Women’s Nike Shox, and again click on a Finish Line ad. The consumer then goes back to the search engine and searches for the branded term “Finish Line” and clicks on their sponsored link.

a) In attribution rule A, you would be allocating the profit, revenue, and conversion credit across all ads involved in a purchase equally. The argument for this rule is that every ad involved in the sale is equally important and therefore deserves equal credit.

b) In attribution rule B, you are choosing to exclude giving credit to the branded term at the end of a purchase path. The argument for this rule is that when a consumer types a branded search at the end of a purchase path, they are just trying to navigate back to site that they have already decided to buy from. Therefore, it makes sense to give profit/revenue/conversion credit to the ads that did the selling rather than a navigational add. It can also be argued that this consumer could have just as easily navigated back to the website through the address bar, an organic link, or though a bookmark.

<

See how others voted

Search, Search, Search

Sunday, August 24th, 2008

In this purchase path, the consumer searches for running shoes and clicks on a Finish Line ad for running shoes. They then refine the search further to look for Women’s Nike Shox, and then click on Finish Line ad. They do a final search for Nike Shox Turbo VII, click on Finish Line ad, and make a purchase.

a) In attribution rule A, you would be allocating the profit, revenue, and conversion credit across all ads involved in purchase equally. The argument for this rule is that every ad involved in the sale is equally important and therefore deserves equal credit.

b) In attribution rule B, we are giving 100% credit to the initial ad that introduced a consumer to the business. The logic for doing this is that without appearing on the first ad, the other ads might not have had a chance to play. Therefore, all credit should go to ad that introduced the searcher to your business.

c) In attribution rule C you are giving 100% credit to the last ad that was clicked on prior to the conversion. The argument for doing this is that you are giving credit to the ad that seems most directly responsible for the conversion.

See how others voted

Which Attribution Solution Is The Right Fit For You?


Join the Attribution Management Forum! The next webinar in this groundbreaking industry series takes place Wednesday March 10th, 2010.

Register Now »

Independent technology research firm Forrester Research, Inc. selected vendors for a 44-criteria evaluation to determine the leaders in the attribution management field.
ClearSaleing Takes "Top Honors"
ClearSaleing received the highest scores in both the “Current Offering” and “Strategy” categories. The company also received a perfect 5.0 score on the strength of its management team.
Download the Report »

About Attribution Management

In the world of online marketing, Attribution Management is the process of properly identifying and valuing the chain of marketing initiatives and advertisements that lead to a sale or conversion.

More about Attribution Management »

Latest Tweet

ClearSaleing Leaps Ahead in Attribution Management: Watch as ClearSaleing Co-Founder and CIO, Adam Goldberg, ta.. http://bit.ly/yfiA6 2009-09-27

Follow us on Twitter »